Wed, 12 Aug 2015
Another solution to Tuesday's git problem
On Tuesday I discussed an interesting solution to the problem of turning this:
Dave Du Cros has suggested an alternative solution: Make the changes required to turn off feature X, and commit them as B, as in my solution:
C' and C have identical trees.
This has the benefit of not requiring anything strange. I think my solution is more general, but it's also weird, and it's not clear that the increased generality is useful.
However, what if there were a
This last command would mean that the previous two commits, normally
one would use
[ Addendum 20200531: Curtis Dunham suggested a much better interface to this functionality
[Other articles in category /prog] permanent link